Today I finished reading
This work involves an enormous amount of detailed research from a period where is very little writing by a number of Roman authors and no real consensus because the tools available to the historian from the earliest years are based upon what can be gleaned from coins, medals, archaeology, excavations, gravestones, and bones and other finds. The frontispiece above, for example, is an over life-size bronze head of Hadrian found in the Thames near London Bridge.
The book is profusely illustrated by colour plates, black and white photographs, and helpful maps. Apart from the colour photographs I have merely featured a selection
Aerial photography now supports earlier excavations which, even before and since the publication of this book will be considered a work in progress for many years to come. Metal detectors are now a widely available modern aid that has aided discovery of numerous hoards. “The burial coin hoards in unusual numbers is often a good indication of crisis, and there is a sudden steep increase in hoards belonging to [the period 268-82 when the threat of Saxon sea raiders first became acute] “
Frere writes very detailed consummate prose complete with dates that can be deciphered, while making clear that much is speculation and intuition. Speaking of the early years he says “The political history of the period is largely to be inferred from a study of the coins.” Similarly “the ear of barley [appearing on the coin of the first Catuvellaunian king] not only advertises the agricultural wealth on which the kingdom’s prosperity rested but also, perhaps, opposes the idea of British beer to the luxurious imports of wine suggested by Verica’s vine leaf.
The earlier chapters in the book, introduced by the Iron Age, describe the conquest chronologically while the last two detail the end of Roman Britain; the large middle section treats the period of four centuries more thematically.
UK Children grew up with the optimistic claim of Julius Caesar that in 55 BC “veni, vidi, vinci” (I came, I saw, I conquered). He did come, he saw, but he was never, on account of what happened to him in Rome, to return after a delay. That pleasure fell to Claudius.
We still enjoy the network of roads built by the military while engaged in the conquest. For defensive purposes they placed forts spaced at a day’s march all along the way. Hadrian’s wall, as shown in black and white above, was originally built to separate Scotland from England. Later it developed as a trade centre and a place of relaxation for holidaying soldiers, many of whom would eventually retire on either side and remain there.
Apart from Scotland there was long resistance in N. Wales, aided by its difficult terrain.
“Industry is attested by the working of bronze and iron, and by the manufacture of pottery. Trade is indicated by the large quantities of imported amphorae once containing wine and oil”.
“the main body of the peasantry seem to have been poor and backward, but … finds of rich and decorated metalwork show that the aristocracy and priesthood were wealthy”.
The administration of Roman Britain was carried out by an hierarchical system under a local governor not unlike our Civil Service. “The headquarters of the financial administration was soon established at London, perhaps even before 60”. They were based on productivity land or a poll tax. “The total number of Roman officials [as time went on]… was not unduly large. This was made possible by the encouragement of local self government and responsibility of the conquered people. At first…by the device of client-kingship, whereby friendly tribes were left under the rule of their own royalty, with whom treaties were made.”
“From the first the Romans sought to encourage the growth of towns.” “They were needed not only as centres of local government but also to aid the spread of education and Roman civilisation.”
In the countryside there was much agricultural production by tenants or owners with allotments, for example corn, fruit trees, and bee-keeping; and breeding of cattle, farm horses, and sheep.
Trade and industry was served by gold, lead, pewter, tin, iron and bronze artefacts such as cauldrons; timber and stone, e.g. Purbeck Marble; pottery, vines and wine. Window glass was imported. Hides, furs, and wool came from Scotland and coal from the north.
Earlier timbered buildings were fairly regularly burnt down by fires. The use of masonry gradually superseded these. Forums, basilicas, theatres amphitheatres and public baths were introduced. The latter structures required aqueduct and drains with “stone built sewers”.
“Romano-British culture arose from the impact of the civilisation of Rome upon the Celtic people of Britain; the result, however, was not a replacement of cultures, but rather what can broadly be described as a synthesis.”
By the end of the first century wooden and mosaic floors, and frescoed walls had been introduced.
As the Latin language spread Celtic survived. “Most educated Romano-Britons were no doubt bilingual”.
“The Roman Empire was very tolerant of religious variety…. merely demanding observance of official religion,” otherwise allowing people to worship where they chose. “the only cults liable to suppression or persecution were those such as Druidism which involved practices ““(like human sacrifice) offensive to civilised thought, or those, such as Judaism or Christianity which…. could be thought of as endangering the safety of the empire.”
During the fourteenth century increased Saxon raids and incursions by Picts, Scots, and Irish bands ravaged the land defended by a weakened army that had been transferred to serve in Europe.
“But though the struggle was long drawn out, two facts are clear. The official connection of Britain with the Roman Empire ended in 410 and was not renewed; but the Roman framework and civilisation of the province were in some sense maintained until 442.”
This evening we dined on Jackie’s ultra thick and tasty chicken and vegetable stewp with fresh crusty bread rolls.